Not until recently, theatres, galleries and orchestras were regarded as a mean of entertaiment, not only for the elderly but also for the young ones.So, the government invested public money in keeping these places in optimum conditions for visitors to have the most pleasant experience ever. But as time went by, society’s likes, need and priorities have radically changed. Therefore, the fate of this money should evolve as well .
During the eighteenth century, moneyed and cultured people looked forward to the weekend only to go to the theatre, sit down there and enjoy the latest play. That was the most popular, and favourite,show business. After some years, the Young also started getting pleasure out of the galleries, museums and orchestras. Due to the large attendance, the state considered that the best use of money was putting i tinto the art world; famous and expensive paitings were bought, and well-known bands were invited.
Currently, not only have society’s likes changed but so have its needs. Art is no longer the focus of attention and, as a result, the idea of subsidising a museum is regarded as a waste of their public money.Given that only a reduced proportion of elderlies maintain the custom, the local budget should be invested in building hospitals, schools and house for homeless people. The use of money should be donated to meet the needs of the big majority, not the ones of a small minority.
To sum up, fifty years ago museums, theatres and painting galleries were crowded. Nowadays, they are empty and the streets are crammed with people looking for entertainment else where. Public money should, thus be devoted to improve the city and its many places, cwhich after so many years of being neglected are growing deteriorated.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario